|
- Single piece of software that
provides a platform for online learning content and communication
tools.
- It is used to deliver a blend
of traditional classroom instruction and Online
delivery.
- It allows easy management
of the learning materials and tracking of student learning.
- Used by students, teachers
and administrators.
- It supports a collaborative
learning community and Multiple modes of learning
|
|
|
Enables leaders to:
- Save time on administrative
tasks
- Simplify organisation
- Easily and quickly communicate
with parents
Enables Parents to:
- Help children with homework
- To know what is going on
in the school
- To get involved with the
school
Enables administrators to:
- Assist learners
- Communicate on a one-to-one or one-to-many basis
- Contribute to learning resources
Enables the teacher to:
- Access resources and tools to support planning, information
sharing within the school and outside the school.
- Share the burden of creating resources with colleagues.
- Import material from other sources.
- Tailor the curriculum to individual learners' needs by supporting
personalised learning.
- Extend learning beyond the classroom and traditional timetables.
- Submit and track activities, including evidence for assessment
Enables learners to:
- Personalise home pages with learning
tools such as tasks, diaries and files.
- Gives every learner access to a personal online web-space
where they can store course work and their achievements.
- Store all their work.
- Display their work to peers and teachers.
|
|
Features that all Users have:
- Differential access for students,
teachers and administrators. This includes Login Names and Passwords
- Personalised
working spaces. Individualised folders
for participants home pages and work.
- Easy navigation, help pages,
quick links, Pervasive references (links for everyone)
- Searching facility within
the LP and outside the LP
- Easy-to-use content creation
tools. Easy authoring tools for text, hyperlinks and graphics.
Web page editing with templates for content pages.
- Information distribution including
administrative information, Calendar, News & Course announcements.
- Communication and collaboration
functions such as Email, Asynchronous collaborative learning
(discussion forums for group learning, threaded discussions)
Synchronous collaborative learning (chats for live instruction
in classroom settings).
Features that Tutor Interfaces have:
- Access control
- Daily management tools
- Flexible course design and
delivery.
- Support of reusable learning
objects.
- Syllabuses Teaching material.
- Ability to track student progress.
- Assessment tools.
- Student Assignment Management,
- Administrative applications.
Features that Student interfaces provide:
- Access to learning resources
with a personalised
study units, course materials, syllabuses, basic teaching
material for self-paced coursework.
- Learning management tools.
Study toolkit.
- Collaborative tools- Discussion
forums, Chat rooms
- Online support
- Other learning materials-
Glossary, FAQs?, usefullinks
- Self assessment such as
online quizzes and exercises such as multiple-choice, true/false
and one-word-answer (formative assessment)
- Assignment Boxes or areas
for submission of student work (summative assessment)
|
Examples of LMS
and what they look like?
Examples: Moodle, WebCT?, Blackboard,EduTools?,LrnLab?, ATutor?, Dokeos, dotLRN, ILIAS, LON-CAPA, OpenUSS?, Sakai,
Spaghettilearning
What do they look like?
Example 1 Eduweb
Eduweb was commissioned by NSW DET and created
as a free product for public schools. It is gaining popularity as web
services are being implemented across the state.
Example 2 Moodle
- Modular Object-Oriented Dynamic
Learning Environment
- Moodle
is a Course Management system (CMS)
- Software package for producing
internet-based courses and web sites.
- Opensource
(free)
- The most adaptable learning
platform
- Moodle
over 100,000 registered users on this site alone, speaking over 70
languages in over 150 countries.
A study called “An Evaluation of Open Source E-Learning Platforms Stressing
Adaptation Issues” found that Moodle outperforms
all other platforms and also obtained the best rating in the adaptation
category. The other LPs?
thy compared it to were ATutor?, Dokeos, dotLRN, ILIAS, LON-CAPA, OpenUSS?, Sakai and Spaghetti learning. Adaptability concerns the ability
to customize the platform, ability for individual personalization and
adaptivity (automatic adaptation to the individual user’s
needs).
Example 3 LrnLab?
This is an example of a third generation of LPs?.
What
are 3G Learning Content Management Systems?
Shelley R. Robbins (2002) suggests the following stages in
the evolution of Learning Content Management Systems:
Stage 1: Generic content libraries
Stage 2: Learning management systems.
Stage 3: Outsourced e-learning platforms.
Stage 4: Learning content management systems.
I suggest there is a fifth stage which includes these third generation
LPs?. Laister and Koubek (2001) looked the requirements for a 3rd Generation
Learning Platforms and the Motivation for Collaborative Learning. They
viewed what I am calling stage 5 as a transition from a content / resource
based LPs? that focus on the interaction between human and computer
to a human-centred LPs? that is oriented towards communication processes
between people. These include virtual teams, knowledge- and learning
communities and a networked economy. 3G LPs? support collaborative processes
through ICT. They provide the environment and tools for an “open, participative
and reflective learning in community” (Laister and Koubek, 2001)
What is
the potential for LMS?
LMS have the potential to free us from constraints that currently prevent
the full integration of technology in the classroom. The provision of
a simpler, user friendly, group friendly system may help us to overcome
the barriers that we now face.
The change from command based computers to the GUI interface meant
many more people (such as myself) were more comfortable using computers.
The simplicity and ease of using a LMSs? has the potential to “free
us from poorly designed software and inhospitable organisational structures
that currently constrain teacher use” (Cuban Oversold and Underused,
p 139).
Could this be what teachers need to get greater use of computers in
schools.? The learning management system used by LrnLab? has vastly
simplified the process of accessing information, creating documents,
organising our work, handing in assignments, communicating with the
other students or lecturers. Teachers do not want to have to learn complicated
software programs. As the ease of use improves so too will the frequency
of use.
What do
I need to setup a LMS and what should I look for when I choose a LMS?
You need a:
-
web server which supports the language that the
LMS is written in (PHP is common),
-
database backend (such as MySQL?.)
You should look for the following features:
-
An open interface with other software such as Oasis
which is the software the NSW public schools use for administration.
The LP must function as a stand-alone application and it also needs
to be able to interface effectively with other systems such as Oasis
for student data. The interfaces needs to support simple integration
formats such as XML .
-
Security The LP must contain security and encryption
mechanisms to protect the learning content and user data. The LP needs
to have secure user privileges, which set permission to levels that
users need but do not allow security to be compromised. It should
also contain an automatic backup system .
-
Automated implementation processes Deployment and
implementation should not be too difficult or take too long. It should
have an installation wizard that gives you options for customisation.
-
Easy-to-use content creation tools Teachers need
to be able to create course content with authoring applications they
are familiar with or a simple WYSIWIG editor embedded in the system.
Content creators (teachers, administrators and students) must be able
to use standard authoring tools that they're familiar with rather
than being forced to use tools embedded in the LCMS.
-
Flexible course design and delivery The LMs? must
offer flexibility within the system so it can be adapted to the needs
of the school or organisation.
-
Support of reusable learning objects Although the
initial creation of learning objects takes some time, the benefit
comes when it can be used again. Often the first use of the object
will suggest changes/editing but over time this is a time saving way
teachers can work.
-
Administrative applications The LP sould be able
to manage enrollment and progress of learners, as well as course content,
timing, and tracking.
-
Assessment tools The best LPs? assess the learner's
prior knowledge to determine entry point and assesses what he or she
learns. It is important to have a system that allows for a variety
of assessment strategies: multiple choice tests, assignment boxes,
analyitic tools for participation etc.
-
Communication and collaboration functions As well
as being able to study alone the LP should provide opportunity to
interact with the technology, teacher, or peers. The learning environment
is more effective if the student can interact with the learning materials;
become active learners. Asynchronous and synchronous communication
allows for collaborative work
-
Facilities for content migration The LP must offer
easy-to-use conversion tools. I.e. converting from a word document
to a web page in the LMS.
What sort
of barriers will I have to hurdle to make it work?
Barrier |
Solution |
| People resisting the change from the status quo. Solution: |
Develop a shared vision, show strong leadership. Educate all
stakeholders about the benefits. Demonstrate how easy it is to create
courses and use the LP. |
| Resistance from "the belief - or fear - that the ultimate
aim of instructional technology is to reduce or even remove the
human element of instruction." |
Explain that education using the computer will always require
human teachers and facilitators. "IT’s role is to augment (not
to replace) the teacher" (Van Dam et al, 2005) |
| Finance: The cost of preparing materials is high. The cost of
maintaining, revising and updating courses is high. |
Gain administrative and government support if possible. Emphasise
the long tern cost effectiveness. Emphasise that embracing technology
can be a solution to increased "demands and reduced resources"
(Bates 2000. P 216). |
| Expertise: The unique pedagogy of e-learning requires special
skills in learning design and interaction design. |
Create an Instructional designer position to maintain the quality
of the learning materials and work with subject experts. Provide
templates and best practice examples for all staff to see. |
| Time and workload to implement, develop and maintain the LP. |
Emphasise the time saving over the long term. Provide relief
from the classroom for teachers to develop materials and become
familiar with the LP. Provide technical support. Provide incentives
and rewards for effective implementation. |
| Students who are not well-motivated or organised will reject this
learning environment. |
Educate students on effective ways of organizing their work;
naming files and creating folders. |
| Students working alone will miss having contact and interaction
with their peers and the teacher. |
Provide a mix between face to face and on line learning according
to the needs of the students. The tutor really needs to be flexible
about the way they provide support. |
| Teachers have a diminished role and a sense of loss of control.
|
Ensure that staff appraisals do not disadvantage teachers who
use the LP extensively. Run professional development programs that
educate teachers about the advantages and merit of learner centered
teaching methods and how the LP can facilitate this process. "The
appropriate use of IT will empower teachers to enhance their mentoring
roles"(Van Dam et al, 2005). |
| Course requirements emphasise individual teaching criteria and
objectives so it is difficult to make assessments within this collaborative
learning environment. |
Remind teachers that there are usually group work objectives
included in syllabi and show them ways of assessing individual achievements
within a collaborative environment. |
| Introvert students who find it difficult to communicate with groups
will feel a sense of pressure. |
Train teachers to identify and support these students. Encourage
teachers to talk about these issues with students emphasising that
it is natural for some students to feel this way. Teachers need
to be flexible in how they give feedback to students depending on
the students' needs. |
References
Wikipedia Learning Management System
Assessing Learning Management Systems by John L. Hall: senior vice
president of Oracle University Jan 2003
Moodle
An introduction to learning platforms: British Educational Communications
and Technology Agency 2003-2004
Learning Platforms By Terry Freedman 2006
"Teachernet UK Learning Platforms Department for Education and
Skills 1995–2006":http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/wholeschool/ictis/infrastructure/learningplatforms/
An Evaluation of Open Source E-Learning Platforms Stressing Adaptation
Issues* Sabine Graf and Beate List Women’s Postgraduate College of Internet
Technologies Vienna University of Technology {graf, list}@wit.tuwien.ac.at
2005
The Evolution of the Learning Content Management System By Shelley
R. Robbins 2002
Towards a Pattern Language for Learning Management Systems: Paris Avgeriou
, Andreas Papasalouros Symeon Retalis , Manolis Skordalakis 1999
3rd Generation Learning Platforms Requirements and Motivation for Collaborative
Learning Johann Laister, Anni Koubek Technikum Joanneum © EURODL
2001
The Evolution of the Learning Content Management System By Shelley
R. Robbins April 2002
© Annette Culley 2006
|